The illegal act of taking another person’s life is known as murder. Depending on the context, those accused could be charged with either first-degree or second-degree homicide. However, there are many different scenarios and charges that can accompany homicide charges in Nevada.
Premeditated murder, or first-degree homicide, encompasses any intentional act of killing. This can refer to anything from shooting, stabbing, and strangling someone to poisoning them or inflicting torture upon them until they die. In Nevada’s criminal system, this is seen as the most heinous crime one can commit with a maximum punishment of either imprisonment for life – or in certain instances even execution.
The heinous act of first-degree murder also incorporates “felony murder.” This occurs when an individual kills another person while engaging in any of the following serious criminal offenses:
A person can be held accountable for felony murder, even if they had no intention of causing the death of another individual while in the throes of committing a separate crime. That’s why having an aggressive Las Vegas murder defense attorney in your corner is critical to obtaining the best possible outcome in your case.
Those who assist others in committing murder are also criminally liable for the death which occurred, even if they did not pull the trigger. Commonly known as aiding and abetting, some examples of this offense include:
Unintentional homicides that are committed as a result of recklessness or negligence comprise second-degree murder. For instance, playing Russian roulette would be considered an example of this – even though the defendant may not have had any desire to cause harm, anyone with common sense would know that firing off a partly loaded gun carries immense risk and could lead to death.
NRS 484C.430 Penalty if death or substantial bodily harm results; exception; segregation of offender; plea bargaining restricted; suspension of sentence and probation prohibited; affirmative defense; aggravating factor. [Effective until the date of the repeal of the federal law requiring each state to make it unlawful for a person to operate a motor vehicle with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.08 percent or greater as a condition to receiving federal funding for the construction of highways in this State.]
1. Unless a greater penalty is provided pursuant to NRS 484C.440, a person who:
(a) Is under the influence of intoxicating liquor;
(b) Has a concentration of alcohol of 0.08 or more in his or her blood or breath;
(c) Is found by measurement within 2 hours after driving or being in actual physical control of a vehicle to have a concentration of alcohol of 0.08 or more in his or her blood or breath;
(d) Is under the influence of a controlled substance or is under the combined influence of intoxicating liquor and a controlled substance;
(e) Inhales, ingests, applies or otherwise uses any chemical, poison or organic solvent, or any compound or combination of any of these, to a degree which renders the person incapable of safely driving or exercising actual physical control of a vehicle; or
(f) Has a prohibited substance in his or her blood or urine in an amount that is equal to or greater than the amount set forth in subsection 3 of NRS 484C.110,
and does any act or neglects any duty imposed by law while driving or in actual physical control of any vehicle on or off the highways of this State, if the act or neglect of duty proximately causes the death of, or substantial bodily harm to, another person, is guilty of a category B felony and shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for a minimum term of not less than 2 years and a maximum term of not more than 20 years and must be further punished by a fine of not less than $2,000 nor more than $5,000. A person so imprisoned must, insofar as practicable, be segregated from offenders whose crimes were violent and, insofar as practicable, be assigned to an institution or facility of minimum security.
2. A prosecuting attorney shall not dismiss a charge of violating the provisions of subsection 1 in exchange for a plea of guilty, guilty but mentally ill or nolo contendere to a lesser charge or for any other reason unless the attorney knows or it is obvious that the charge is not supported by probable cause or cannot be proved at the time of trial. A sentence imposed pursuant to subsection 1 may not be suspended nor may probation be granted.
3. If consumption is proven by a preponderance of the evidence, it is an affirmative defense under paragraph (c) of subsection 1 that the defendant consumed a sufficient quantity of alcohol after driving or being in actual physical control of the vehicle, and before his or her blood or breath was tested, to cause the defendant to have a concentration of alcohol of 0.08 or more in his or her blood or breath. A defendant who intends to offer this defense at a trial or preliminary hearing must, not less than 14 days before the trial or hearing or at such other time as the court may direct, file and serve on the prosecuting attorney a written notice of that intent.
4. If the defendant was transporting a person who is less than 15 years of age in the motor vehicle at the time of the violation, the court shall consider that fact as an aggravating factor in determining the sentence of the defendant.
(Added to NRS by 1973, 447; A 1979, 1484; 1981, 1926; 1983, 1073; 1985, 818, 1015; 1989, 1111; 1991, 220, 489, 498, 837; 1995, 312, 1300, 2473; 1997, 644; 1999, 2452, 3422; 2001, 172; 2003, 1492, 2560; 2005, 144; 2007, 1453)-(Substituted in revision for NRS 484.3795)
NRS 484C.430 Penalty if death or substantial bodily harm results; exception; segregation of offender; plea bargaining restricted; suspension of sentence and probation prohibited; affirmative defense; aggravating factor. [Effective on the date of the repeal of the federal law requiring each state to make it unlawful for a person to operate a motor vehicle with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.08 percent or greater as a condition to receiving federal funding for the construction of highways in this State.]
1. Unless a greater penalty is provided pursuant to NRS 484C.440, a person who:
(a) Is under the influence of intoxicating liquor;
(b) Has a concentration of alcohol of 0.10 or more in his or her blood or breath;
(c) Is found by measurement within 2 hours after driving or being in actual physical control of a vehicle to have a concentration of alcohol of 0.10 or more in his or her blood or breath;
(d) Is under the influence of a controlled substance or is under the combined influence of intoxicating liquor and a controlled substance;
(e) Inhales, ingests, applies or otherwise uses any chemical, poison or organic solvent, or any compound or combination of any of these, to a degree which renders the person incapable of safely driving or exercising actual physical control of a vehicle; or
(f) Has a prohibited substance in his or her blood or urine in an amount that is equal to or greater than the amount set forth in subsection 3 of NRS 484C.110,
2. A prosecuting attorney shall not dismiss a charge of violating the provisions of subsection 1 in exchange for a plea of guilty, guilty but mentally ill or nolo contendere to a lesser charge or for any other reason unless the attorney knows or it is obvious that the charge is not supported by probable cause or cannot be proved at the time of trial. A sentence imposed pursuant to subsection 1 may not be suspended nor may probation be granted.
3. If consumption is proven by a preponderance of the evidence, it is an affirmative defense under paragraph (c) of subsection 1 that the defendant consumed a sufficient quantity of alcohol after driving or being in actual physical control of the vehicle, and before his or her blood or breath was tested, to cause the defendant to have a concentration of alcohol of 0.10 or more in his or her blood or breath. A defendant who intends to offer this defense at a trial or preliminary hearing must, not less than 14 days before the trial or hearing or at such other time as the court may direct, file and serve on the prosecuting attorney a written notice of that intent.
4. If the defendant was transporting a person who is less than 15 years of age in the motor vehicle at the time of the violation, the court shall consider that fact as an aggravating factor in determining the sentence of the defendant.
(Added to NRS by 1973, 447; A 1979, 1484; 1981, 1926; 1983, 1073; 1985, 818, 1015; 1989, 1111; 1991, 220, 489, 498, 837; 1995, 312, 1300, 2473; 1997, 644; 1999, 2452, 3422; 2001, 172; 2003, 1492, 2560; 2005, 144, 145; 2007, 1453, effective on the date of the repeal of the federal law requiring each state to make it unlawful for a person to operate a motor vehicle with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.08 percent or greater as a condition to receiving federal funding for the construction of highways in this State)-(Substituted in revision for NRS 484.3795)
When someone unintentionally causes death by providing drugs to another person, it is always considered second-degree murder. For example, if delicious brownies that are laced with ecstasy are brought to a potluck and one of the guests has an unfortunate reaction that leads to their death – they will be prosecuted for murder. If you would like more information on this crime in Nevada specifically, please refer to NRS 453.333 for further details.
The criminal offense of attempted murder is when a person deliberately endeavors to take the life of another individual, yet doesn’t succeed. Drawing an example would be shooting at someone and missing them or not inflicting serious harm upon them. It’s essential to recognize that even if the alleged victim doesn’t pass away, you can still be charged with attempted murder. By and large, intentioned offenses are one degree less serious than their completed counterparts.
The critical factor that determines the legal distinction between an attempted homicide and an aggravated assault is a defendant’s intention. If it can be successfully demonstrated that they did not intend to take another person’s life, then prosecutors may reduce the associated charges. It is critical to have a credible murder defense lawyer in Las Vegas who is knowledgeable in criminal law on your side if you are facing a trial for attempted murder or assault, as comprehending the contrast between these two offenses could be paramount for effective court strategy. Don’t leave yourself exposed – speak with a criminal defense attorney who knows both sides of this complex legal issue.
Depending on the level of culpability, sentencing for murder can vary greatly. In cases where an unintentional killing occurs and a conviction of second-degree murder is established, punishments tend to be less punitive than those associated with first-degree convictions.