Contact Us
Attorney Chandon S. Alexander is a Las Vegas lawyer who is an active member of the National Trial Lawyers Association and has been recognized as one of the Top 10 Attorneys under 40. He is a member of the Clark County Bar Association, American Bar Association, and the Nevada Justice Association.
According to Nevada law, NRS 484C.110, an individual is guilty of a marijuana DUI if any of the following conditions are true at the time of the arrest. Additionally, because these state laws only discuss the amount of marijuana found in a driver’s urine or blood, a driver can still be arrested for driving under the influence of marijuana in Nevada even if the driver is not high at the time of the arrest. Although the definition of a marijuana DUI is clear, no two cases are alike. For a better understanding of your specific case, it’s recommended that you speak with a Las Vegas marijuana DUI attorney to understand the best way to proceed with litigation.
According to NRS 484C.110, it’s against the law for an individual to be behind the wheel, or to be “in actual physical control of a vehicle” on a public road, when the person has the following amounts of Marijuana, or Metabolite, in their system:
A first marijuana DUI offense within the last 7 years is charged as a misdemeanor as long as no death or serious injury occurred. The penalties for a first time marijuana DUI includes the following:
A second marijuana DUI offense within the last 7 years is charged as a misdemeanor as long as no death or serious injury resulted. The penalties for a second time marijuana DUI includes the following:
A third marijuana DUI offense within the last 7 years is charged as a category B felony as long as no death or serious injury resulted. The penalties for a third-time marijuana DUI include the following:
A marijuana DUI offense that causes death or serious injury is also charged as a category B felony. The penalties for a marijuana DUI that causes injury or death includes the following:
According to NRS 484C.080, an individual can still face marijuana DUI charges in Nevada if they are found to have marijuana metabolites in their system. A prohibited substance could include any of the following substances listed below. Especially if the person who uses the substance has not been issued a valid prescription to use the substance and the substance is classified in schedule I or II according to NRS 453.166. Although marijuana metabolites are not listed in schedule I or II of NRS 453.166, they are specifically listed as a prohibited substance in the statute.
As stated in NRS 484C.160, when a police officer forms a reasonable belief that the driver is operating a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or drugs, the police officer may request a blood test to determine the concentration of drugs in the blood. In Nevada, a driver cannot effectively refuse to take the test because under NRS 484C.150 because the law presumes that the driver had given implied consent to the test when the driver applied for and was issued a driver’s license.
Under Nevada law, if a driver refuses to take the blood or urine test, the police officer is given the authority to do two things: the police can temporarily revoke the driver’s license and the police can apply for a warrant to give them authority to use reasonable force to obtain a blood sample from the driver. The requirement for the Nevada police to first obtain a warrant before taking a blood sample from the driver is in compliance with the doctrine laid down by the US Supreme Court in 2013 in the case of Missouri v. McNeely. Reasonable force means handcuffing or strapping down the driver so that a technician may take a blood sample. Implied consent is often a misunderstood topic to the general public, luckily, an experienced Las Vegas marijuana DUI attorney can help you better understand the potential stakes as well as the best defense strategy to deploy.
No, not at this time, in 2021 the Las Vegas police have done away with DUI checkpoints and are taking a new approach to getting impaired drivers off the streets. The new approach involves officers saturating an area and looking for impaired drivers in that vicinity. The Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department has affectionately named this police tactic a “Blitz.”
“Instead of going out and fishing, we wanted to go out and be hunters,” said Metropolitan Police Department Lt. Bret Ficklin. “We want to take an active, proactive approach to finding DUI drivers. We’re sending resources around the whole area and actively look for DUI drivers.” The DUI Strike Team patrols the city in a targeted blitz, usually picking one Saturday night each month to send up to 70 officers from multiple jurisdictions into a section of town to scout out impaired drivers.
As an example, during one of these Blitzes in October 2021, the Las Vegas Police reported the following:
These Blitzes occur about twice a month and they do not have to conform to rules regarding DUI checkpoints. If you are stopped during one of these blitzes and the police officer smells alcohol or the scent of marijuana from the car, the officer will form a reasonable belief that the driver is under the influence of either alcohol or marijuana. They can request the driver to take a sobriety test and when the driver fails the field sobriety test, the police officer can request the driver to take a blood or urine test to confirm the level of THC in their blood. The driver will be placed on hold and will not be allowed to leave until they have submitted to a blood or urine test. When working with the Spartacus Law Firm and our Las Vegas marijuana DUI attorney, we’ll make sure we review the sobriety test in detail and determine if there are any issues that can present reasonable doubt in court or dispute the sobriety tests validity.
In most scenarios, law enforcement will initiate a traffic stop that leads to an investigation of impaired driving. Driving conduct such as weaving between lanes, driving too slow or too fast, running through a red light or failing to stop at a stop sign, swerving, or even being asleep behind the wheel of your vehicle can give law enforcement probable cause to initiate a traffic stop which ca lead to an impairment investigation. Once a traffic stop has been initiated if the officer suspects impairment he or she may ask the driver to submit to a preliminary breath test (PBT) pursuant to NRS 484C.150.
If a driver passes the PBT but exhibits other signs of impairment, law enforcement may suspect the driver of being under the influence of a drug, such as marijuana.
At this point, the officer may invoke the assistance of a drug recognition expert or drug recognition evaluator (DRE) to assist in the investigation. The DRE officer may question the driver about their general health, consumption of food, alcohol, drugs, prescribed medications, and during this questioning, the DRE will make observations about coordination and speech patterns. The DRE may also note the driver’s pupil size, pulse, and blood pressure.
One of the first challenges to a driving under the influence charge is to challenge the probable cause of the traffic stop itself. A motion to suppress the evidence can challenge the probable cause for initiating the traffic stop, and if the motion is granted the DUID charge will be dismissed.
An experienced defense attorney may also be able to rebut the presumption that you were impaired while you were in actual physical control of a vehicle. Marijuana stays in your system long after the intoxicating effects have worn off. Proving impairment in a marijuana DUI case can be difficult, and the prosecutor may be willing to stipulate to a negotiated resolution such as reckless driving, careless driving, or speeding.
Cotter v. State, 738 P.2d 506 (1987) — Holding that aside from per se DUI cases, the state must show more than consumption of a controlled substance and subsequent driving. Furthermore, the State must show impairment as “to a degree which renders him incapable of driving safely or exercising actual physical control of the vehicle.”
Sheriff Clark County v. Burcham, 198 P.3d 326 (2008) — Holding that aside from per se laws, whether a driver is under the influence will “always be a question of fact, to be considered in the light of such variable circumstances as the individual’s resistance to the substance, the amount ingested and the type and time of ingestion. An attack on the blood draw itself may be warranted if the driver did not consent to the blood draw and the police officer failed to obtain a warrant to perform a blood draw.
At the Spartacus Law Firm, we will also analyze the testing equipment to determine whether the police or lab technicians had their equipment up to date, certified, and functional, and whether any contamination of the blood sample or chain of custody could have occurred.
Although it’s likely for a license suspension, there are plenty of instances where this can be avoided. Following a blood test in Nevada, the driver gets to keep their driver’s license until the results come back from the lab and show positive for drugs. At this point, the Nevada DMV notifies the driver by mail that their license is being suspended. The driver may then request a Nevada DMV hearing to contest the suspension. The length of the license suspension depends on whether the driver has previous DUIs: